tags & pattern-based navigation
this page compiles a set of specific tags and opinionated knowledge design patterns, that i'm using in this garden to help you better navigate all of the complex information presented here at different layers of depth.
tag-based navigation
most of the contents on this garden can be filtered/navigated through a few lenses:
8 major domains/archetypes: #alchemy, #design, #art, #lab, #player, #host, #regen, #music.
4 stages of note maturity: #π³ (very early, still not planted), #π± (early, seedling), #πΏ (growing, budding) and #π² (robust, evergreen).
5 major types of notes:
- actors: #person, #organization, #institution, #initiative, #community, #network
- knowledge: #inquiry, #term, #concept, #topic, #field, #lineage, #perspective, #claim, #diagnosis, #heuristic, #framework, #methodology, #pattern , #reflection (personal), #datapoint
- projects: #project, #tool, #experiment, #prototype, #response (an intentional response to the metacrisis or similarly perceived global escalating challenges)
- sources: #article, #book, #course, #paper, #podcast, #video, #publication, #presentation, #website, #socialpost, #highlights, #resource (usually a website or a compilation of resources), #dataset
- original work/thought: #c4ss1us, #l1f3, #essay
soon:
- 4 layers of application: #personal, #local, #regional, #global.
- 3 horizons of focus/application: #h1 (short-term, reduce harm), #h2 (mid-term, empower/create supportive conditions), #h3 (long-term, design new systems, games and institutions).
pattern-based navigation
notes also have a few other features (patterns) to help further filter and navigate them. these are still in the process of being added, sothey're still not present in many notes:
- relevance scores (0-100) - my own judgement over how relevant this note is - both for myself and for anyone attempting to work towards the same vision of this garden (i.e. thriving, regenerative, more playful, just, resilient, wise and ultimately, sacred realities).
- relevance context - a description of: why is it relevant for me?
- aliveness score (0-100) - different from relevance (which tends to be long-term), how much is this content alive in my current investigations?
- [familiarity level |familiarity level ] - how familiar am i with the contents/topic/authors in that note?
- familiarity context - a description of: what's my familiarity with it?
- cognitive complexity (0-100) - how cognitively demanding this content might be.
- complexity context - a description of: why can it be cognitively demanding?
- emotional density (0-100) - how emotionally demanding this content might be.
- emotional context - a description of: why can it be emotionally demanding?
- information scope (0-100) - how large is this body of work and/or other relevant, associated bodies of work necessary for making sense of this one?
- epistemic status (0-15) - how tested and validated (across multiple methods and perspectives) the contents and claims within that note are.
-
- unknown/uninvestigated,
-
- wild speculation,
-
- personally resonant,
-
- generally regarded as true within some communities,
-
- inter-subjectively validated,
-
- low levels of research conducted,
-
- basic level of research conducted,
-
- biases corrections sought out,
-
- foundational research conducted,
-
- peer-reviewed,
-
- large body of research/systematic research conducted,
-
- transdisciplinarily critiqued,
-
- transdisciplinarily evolved,
-
- anthro-ontologically verified,
-
- actively uninvisibilizing & anthro-ontologically verified
-
- confidence level (0-100) - contrasting with the epistemic status, this is a deeply personal judgment. i.e. contents and claims within a note can be considered established knowledge in a field. if i know nothing about it, my confidence level can be low.
- confidence context - a description of: why is my confidence at that level? examples: supported by people i trust (in-group), validated by my experience* (self-validation), etc... - hyperlinks - the clickable links throughout a note, which are related notes to dive deeper and feed your curiosity.